©Dianne Irene,
Published in December 2019
Link of the Original Article in Question (Alternatively Cured: The Doctors That are Leading the Way)
History is full of cycles of freedoms and losses of freedoms. In fact, the loss of freedom in place of technology makes for an even greater danger to society. This is because much of our society is based on a few who hold the most power. This means that if even one of them becomes corrupt then there will be far reaching consequences. Under the right manipulation many can even come to believe that these losses of freedoms are good for them. They will then become monitors who hunt down, harass, and punish those who do not fall in line.
One such example is during WWII when people turned in the Jews to the Nazis so they would be “good citizens”. It wasn’t just socially acceptable to shun the Jews, but it became acceptable to torture, rape, kill, and force medical procedures and experiments on them. They became “nonpersons”. It even became punishable for not turning them in to the state. It began with an idea of what was good or bad, false or true, and the right to police that. This idea became the force behind the slaughter of so many. I know I reference this on occasion and it is because it is the perfect example of what humanity should never do again.
We look back on this and think that it could never happen to us today. How in our modern day could something like this take place? However, I finally cannot keep quiet while all the hate, censorship, and control are rising. What prompted this article was censorship that took place when I posted a link to a free website to progress humanity with an article I had written on doctors with medical degrees that were treating cancer alternatively, which cited many legitimate research studies and information that is known in other countries. One of the things I discussed had been referenced over 300 times in clinical research studies. In fact, I received feedback stating that the link was abusive. At first, I had to laugh. Perhaps, this was someone who had an impulse reaction. Perhaps, their relative, friend or they used chemo and radiation and do not want to know that there was an alternative. Perhaps, it was even someone who worked for what would be considered the competition to alternative medicine. At this point, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that we rethink how we behave in this modern age. It is a slippery slope to condone censorship and even participate in it. When someone can dictate the narrative it will always lead to loss of respect for free thought.
Understand that someone’s expertise, degrees, education, success, position, celebrity status, or power does not mean that they stand for what is right, fair, true, or beneficial. It does not mean they will use their power for altruistic purposes. Integrity is a condition of the soul and what we see as important in the carnal is not who we really are on the etherical level. Making judgments on people who don’t have a superficial profile status is no different than any other discrimination. Every person on this planet is entitled to their own thoughts, ideas, and perspectives. The day we decide that someone else should do the thinking and deciding is the day we are one step closer to another WWII scenario.
We have made it socially acceptable to say things like, “Are you a doctor?” Yet, even doctors get most of their education from textbooks created and funded by the pharma industry. Since it is commercial money making industry that is a conflict of interest. Also, most doctors now only learn one specialization and do not know much outside of what they have been taught unless they do the research themselves. Many of them have started to do that. That was what the article was about. This may have triggered a response because it is a legal requirement for doctors to offer chemo and radiation as cancer treatments. This means they are taught to follow a strict regimen and no doctor wants their license to be in jeopardy. However, there are doctors that are pioneering a movement. I have personally intereacted with some of them and have a great respect for their desire to help others. Many understand how both our technology and development can be better appreciated by working with nature. In other countries, alternatives are much more accepted. However, in the United States, things are controlled and regulated in a manner that does not allow for much deviation from the corporate interests.
Wake up people. Stop shaming others on social media and in public because you can. Stop following and start thinking without a narrative. It is perfectly alright to disagree with someone. In fact, if you have to attack them then that says a lot about your integrity or lack there of. If you cannot accept someone else’s choice to think differently than you then you have an agenda! You are following and not thinking for yourself. If you think for yourself, then you would think about how you would not want someone to control or dictate your thoughts, decisions, and ideas. If you are mature, then you do not need to attack someone who sees things differently than you do. Period.
Here are some clues about fair discourse.
- If they attack the person then they have an agenda. True discourse is about discussing a topic and not attacking the person. Everyone is entitled to discover truth for themselves. This means that you cannot shove something down their throat. If a person feels the need to attack the person instead of arguing the topic then they are not participating in critical thinking. They are merely looking to gain power in the conversation.
- Using stereotypes to justify a perspective means that they also have an agenda. For example, if they say that you do not know what you are talking about because only a doctor or expert would know the answer then they are using a tactic to discredit you and the argument. Most adults are souls that are on a journey to grow and learn. This means that wisdom and discernment is part of our growth. By adulthood, we all should have the discernment, responsibility, and wisdom to know what is true, right and beneficial. Many who have an agenda would like you to believe that you should not make your own choices because they want control.
- Straw man is used to try to attack and win by power. When your words are taken out of context, exaggerated or over stated, they can be easily found faulty. This is a tactic used to falsely win an argument. For example, a legitimate argument is that people should be able to choose what medical procedures they participate in. A straw man attack would be that people should not be able to choose because they are dumb Americans that need to be led by someone else. Just because someone is not a medical doctor does not mean that they do not have the right or intelligence to make that choice.
- Attacking at a weak point. Every argument has considerations. Every consideration has a strength level. Some will be weaker than others. People who are bullies in conversation will look for the weaker points and refute them so that your strong ones also look defeated.
- Attack, Attack. Another tactic that is used is provocation. If they can get you to get hostile or emotional then you will become weaker. This tactic is often used to discredit the person and therefore win the argument.
- Running off the trail. If a person can distract and lead a conversation away from the real issue, they can try to win by default.
- Personal insults. Personally insulting someone usually lowers their ability to think critically unless they are trained or well experienced in handling hostile communication. Remember the person who keeps their composure can think the clearest and therefore has more negotiating power.
- Using tactics to that deflect and shut a person’s communication down. When someone throws catchy phrases at the other person they are deflecting your arguments. For example, what do you know? You don’t have a college degree. How can you think that people will actually believe that? Don’t get so sarcastic about it (even when you are not). They can make you look like the bully or that you are making them the victim of faulty conversation.
- Using You a lot to make it look like the person is entitled. Using you think or you said or you believe encourages the focus on the person instead of the argument. Just with the tone alone these words can convey that the person is about themselves instead of the argument.
- Discourse should be about growth, learning, and understanding. When a person focuses on winning an argument, they are in mental attack mode instead of genuinely trying to understand another person. At the end of the day regardless of anyone’s perspective, a person has the right to explore and discover life.
- Aggressive body language can be used to intimidate, belittle or dismiss the other person. When someone uses their facial expressions or body language to convey aggression, disgust, distrust, or send a dismissive message to you or those who are watching, they are using one of the oldest forms of communication to subconsciously speak. It is just another tactic used to win an argument. It again is a tactic used to attack another person in a disrespectful way.
- If the person will not play fair, then don’t waste your time. Do not return insults and tactics. Stay true to the path. You have every right to disagree with the subject or topic. You have every right to think it is a bad or good idea. Anyone who cannot respect that has an agenda. You have every right to walk away and agree to disagree.
- Understand that these tactics are narcissistic. They are often used by narcissists and sociopaths in every day life. It doesn’t mean that the person arguing with you is a narcissist or sociopath, but what it does show is that they take on the predator stance much like a real one does in everyday life. This certainly shows how they could be exhausting to be around on a regular basis.
- Respect or retreat. If a person cannot be respectful then you have every right to retreat. You do not have to subject yourself to attack and become disheartened. Remember that this behavior needs to stay with them and you can walk away knowing that they are the one that lacks the maturity to deal with real discourse. If someone is harassing you on social media and trying to make you look like the bad guy, know that it is because they cannot deal with the information in a mature manner. See the bigger picture. Know that they are not yet consciously aware enough to have real conversation for growth and understanding.
We are talking about a multi billion dollar industry. Cancer has affected most of us in some way by knowing someone we work with or even our small circle of friends and family contracting cancer. Just a hundred years ago it was one in a thousand (according to some) and now it is one in two who will get cancer according to the British Journal of Cancer. Think about that. I have watched family members and friends battle through cancer. Some of them died and some of them got healthy again. It was a process that angered me and caused me to pour over hundreds of hours of research on this topic. I could not stand to see them suffer. In fact, some that I have known did not get to benefit from this research because I had to learn as I went on this subject. So much of it has been suppressed. One of the programs that I completed is in the alternative field so I did have some background, but what I discovered was truly frustrating.
I also have more of an inside perspective because I have worked in circles in the business world that brushed shoulders with those in the pharma industry. On occasion, I was personally told by staff some of the things that caused me to do the research to begin with. In my earlier years with some naiveté, I approached some executives in the industry in hopes of educating them on some valuable research on things that actually kill the cancer without killing the patient. The idea behind this particular treatment is based on the frequency of the cells. Healthy cells can survive a wider span of frequency, but the cancer cells cannot survive much alteration in frequency. By changing the frequency of the cells, you can create an environment where the cancer cannot survive. What I heard was devastating. Without any regard for me being present, the man in charge turned to one of his subordinates and said “we will find this and destroy it”. In another instance, I was told by a research scientist that they make some of the diseases we see today and that they always have the cure when they make something. I was also told about the education that some staff participates in how to find, seek out, and destroy alternatives that actually are making an impact. I was told the ones that don’t really work are left alone. I was even told that my article was too close to the truth and that some references could disappear.
I even met with a US colonel who had been cured of cancer using alternatives and rejecting all chemo and radiation. The conversation we had was right in line with what I had experienced. He was well aware of the information. Another man whose wife had metastasized cancer that spread through out her body spoke with me about what they used and how she made a full recovery. Again, they rejected traditional medicine. I had a personal friend who had bone cancer that had spread from breast cancer and was not expected to live and she followed the correct protocol and is still alive today. I could go on about countless stories I have encountered and how people are being cured. This cure comes from the body’s own immune system and the alternatives are tools the body uses to do so. This distinction is important. This is because the immune system is the key to a recovery. Your attitude and consciousness also plays a role.
Again, just as in my article I must warn the reader that there are so many products on the market and if you do not have a nutraceuticals grade ingredient then it will not work. There are many false products on the market and this only helps to perpetuate the idea that they do not work. Be careful of them. Also, there are those who give up. You can’t try a protocol for a week and say it did not work. For example, bloodroot taken at a certain level when you have serious cancer can cause you to throw up. You would have to back off the dose and work with your body’s ability to process it, but it works. Again, it only works if you have a legitimate source. You also cannot eat your fast food and acidic drinks with sugar and think that the body can beat hungry metastasized cancer. Your attitude and your willingness to be good to your body and stay the course is essential. Some people simply give up. This is their choice. No one can deny them that even if that is very hard to watch. Sadly, I have seen people who have given up and it was heartbreaking to watch, but all you can do is love them.
Understand that I prefer to focus on solutions and not problems. I focus on human progression. I focus on raising human consciousness and this means our awareness. However, we need to make this issue a priority. I have taught in higher education for many years and taught Psychology, Math, and even Critical Thinking. I don’t watch the news, just believe what others tell me, and I often keep things to myself. However, this subject is important for all of us. People are dying of cancer when it is not necessary. There is a list of doctors that have been murdered, killed, or committed suicide that participated in treating cancer beyond chemo and radiation. While we are not putting stars on Jews, we are putting labels on the holistic community and anyone who participates and doing exactly the same kind of discrimination of deciding what information is acceptable and what is right or wrong and are now policing it.
First, I want to say that cancer is not that big of mystery. We have those who have shown that many types of cancers with some exceptions contain a type of microbe. One such doctor, an oncologist outside of the US, did the research himself in order to verify it. In fact, before the current accepted idea of mystery, the fact that many cases were a fungus was known and documented. Think about it. Millions and millions of dollars have gone into research and still they treat it with chemo and radiation which is a cause of cancer. The price tag is high and some people die from the treatments before the cancer even has a chance to kill them. There are serious side effects and loss of fertility and quality of life.
I would never deny someone’s choice to participate in this, but they have no right to dictate other’s thoughts on the alternatives. We live in a society where people are committing legal infanticide, but we are losing our rights to decide what we put in our bodies to treat a disease we have or do not have. This is seriously dangerous. While you may not agree with someone, taking away their right to talk about, think about, and question it means that the loss of freedom with eventually come back to bite YOU.
I have spoken to those suffering from cancer and respected their decision to do what they wished with their body even if I did not agree. You see, this is the key. We have free will. I have a right to talk about alternatives and they have a right to say no. Just as I have a right to say no to chemo and radiation. It is a sacred right to decide what medical procedures one participates in or rejects for a disease they do or do not have. No one has the right to force or deny anyone else that right. Nor is it right to deny the discussion of such things. Anyone who will not let you question something has an agenda.
Further Reading:
Why everything you know about cancer is wrong
https://www.cancertutor.com/cancer-myths/
Most people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that orthodox medicine is frantically searching for a cure for cancer. There are two problems with these beliefs. Both beliefs are complete nonsense and come from the propaganda and deceptions of television.
We believe cancer is not caused by DNA damage. The definition of a cancer cell is a cell with low ATP energy (i.e. a low level of adenosine triphosphate). It is difficult to imagine a cell biologist who thinks that DNA damage can cause low levels of ATP energy. Only a very, very small fraction of DNA has anything to do with the creation of ATP energy. Yet the media glorifies all of the “cancer researchers” who are diligently trying to “fix” the DNA damage of cancer cells.
Microbes
In our research, we have found that the low ATP level is actually caused by microbes which are inside the cancer cells, generally Helicobacter Pylori. This is an amazing microbe that can have 16 different sizes and shapes and sizes depending on the pH it is exposed to. For more advanced information, see: Advanced Cancer Theory.
This microbe intercepts glucose as it enters the cancer cells and thus reduces the amount of glucose available to be converted into pyruvate. With less pyruvate, the cell will create less ATP energy (of course I am skipping many steps in this process). For a more detailed discussion read What Causes Cancer.
Killing cancer cells is “old school” but there is nothing wrong with things that can safely target and kill cancer cells (such as purple grape juice), but the new approach is to kill the microbes inside the cancer cells. This was first done in the 1930s but that technology was persecuted and shut down by the FDA and AMA. It has been restored, however, by the High RF Frequency Devices (which are not their real name, which we cannot use on this website due to the FDA).
Your Doctor Can't Cure Your Cancer Because --- He Can't Prevent or Cure His Own!
Lorraine Day, M.D.
Doctors develop cancer at the same rate as the general population. And doctors DIE of cancer at the same rate as the general population.
Obviously that means that doctors don’t know how to prevent or cure cancer because if they did, they would certainly prevent cancer from developing in themselves. And if they did develop cancer – they would know how to cure it.
But they don’t!
So why would you go to a doctor for the treatment of your cancer when your doctor doesn’t even know how to prevent or cure cancer in himself (or herself)?
Surveys show that 75% of doctors would NOT have chemotherapy if they developed cancer, yet they invariably prescribe it for their patients.
The ‘cancer growing in cancer medicine’: pharma money paid to doctors
By Vinay Prasad
October 30, 2019
Expert physicians play an oversized role in cancer medicine. They write the editorials in major medical journals that can influence physicians’ prescribing practices, they give educational sessions at national meetings, and they decide what evidence is good enough for off-label use. Spoiler alert: That evidence is often weak. All of this might be fine if experts offered neutral or unbiased information, but evidence suggests they do not.
One study found that 85% of the experts who wrote widely used cancer guidelines had received payments averaging more than $10,000 from pharmaceutical companies. These guidelines mandate that Medicare pay for off-label use of cancer drugs. Research also shows that physicians who consistently put pharmaceutical money in their bank accounts are more likely to prescribe that company’s drugs.
Financial conflict of interest in cancer medicine matters. The pharmaceutical industry is run by intelligent people who choose to pay physicians millions of dollars. It is hard to believe they have not calculated that this aids their bottom lines. Within the profession, there is little interest in reform. Our rules are suggestions. Our punishments lack teeth.
Every Cancer Can be Cured in Weeks explains Dr. Leonard Coldwell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgbdNNfotwM
Why Big Pharma can’t afford to cure you
Milton Packer MD
- Most drug development of late has focused on cancer and rare diseases because these are the main two areas that can tolerate exorbitant pricing, sometimes in excess of $1 million per treatment
- The burden of these costs, that pay for treatments for a few, impact the majority (who don’t have cancer or rare diseases) who then have to put up with second-rate, cheaper healthcare services and drugs
- Drug companies are avoiding developing drugs that work well especially if they provide one-off cures because they will lose on-going revenue.
- Biotech companies innovating in the field of healthcare are struggling to get investment if their products are too effective (even with sky-high pricing) and provide an actual cure for disease.
Billions of dollars to be lost if cancer is cured:
why Big Pharma profits from this deadly disease
By Greg White
https://www.newstarget.com/2016-04-05-billions-of-dollars-to-be-lost-
if-cancer-is-cured-why-big-pharma-profits-from-this-deadly-disease.html
The “Big C” is big cash. A whopping $100 billion are spent on noxious chemotherapy treatments each year. Yet in many cases, there is no underlining condition that actually needs to be treated. Tens of millions of people are pumped full of poison after crooked oncologists intentionally misdiagnose them with cancer.
Oncologists from all corners of the globe are guilty of such heinous acts. “The word ‘cancer’ often invokes the specter of an inexorably lethal process; however, cancers are heterogeneous and can follow multiple paths, not all of which progress to metastases and death, and include indolent disease that causes no harm during the patient’s lifetime,” reads the abstract to a study titled “Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Cancer An Opportunity for Improvement,” as reported by Natural News‘ Mike Adams.
The study goes on to note how several tissue lesions in human biology are diagnosed under the ominous term cancer and would pose no threat to the body if left untreated. These treatments produce $100 billion a year in chemotherapy revenues, which are fueled by false cancer diagnoses.
“Physicians, patients and the general public must recognize that over-diagnosing is common and occurs more frequently with cancer screening,” cautions the NCI-commissioned science article in JAMA.
The Great Cancer Hoax: The Brilliant Cure the FDA Tried Their Best to Shut Down...
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011
/06/11/burzynski-the-movie.aspx
- Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski won the largest and possibly most convoluted legal battle against the FDA in American history over his remarkable cancer treatment, and his story is presented in detail in the film
- He discovered antineoplastons, nontoxic peptides and amino acid derivatives that act as molecular switches capable of turning on cancer, suppressing genes, and turning off oncogenes (cancer genes). In a simplistic way, antineoplastons are to cancer what a broad-spectrum antibiotic is to infectious disease
- Dr. Burzynski's patients who received antineoplaston treatment significantly outlived cancer patients who received conventional chemotherapy drugs, such as Cisplatin and Doxorubicin
- His cancer treatment surpassed all other treatments on the market and was met with enormous opposition from conventional medicine because it threatened the entire paradigm (and profits) of the cancer industry
A cure for cancer? Israeli scientists may have found one
“Our results are consistent and repeatable.”
By MAAYAN JAFFE-HOFFMAN
JANUARY 28, 2019 23:14
https://www.jpost.com/HEALTH-SCIENCE/A-cure-for-cancer-Israeli-
scientists-say-they-think-they-found-one-578939
“We believe we will offer in a year’s time a complete cure for cancer,” said Dan Aridor, of a new treatment being developed by his company, Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies Ltd. (AEBi), which was founded in 2000 in the ITEK incubator. AEBi developed the SoAP platform, which provides functional leads to very difficult targets.
“Our cancer cure will be effective from day one, will last a duration of a few weeks and will have no or minimal side-effects at a much lower cost than most other treatments on the market,” Aridor said. “Our solution will be both generic and personal.”
Pharma influence widespread at medical schools: study
Wendy Glauser
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3778453/
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17; 185(13): 1121–1122.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4563
Recent research has revealed widespread pharmaceutical influence and weak institutional safeguards in Canadian medical schools. But lecturers, medical students and ethicists are far from united on the extent to which relations with industry are acceptable and what role universities should play in preparing students to withstand influence.
A July 4 study in PLoS One ranked the rigour of Canadian medical schools’ 2011 conflict-of-interest policies (PLoS One 2013;8:e68633). A simple conflict of interest would be gifts, where drug companies provide pens, prescription pads or lunches, while a more complex conflict of interest would be ghostwriting, where faculty members sign on as authors of studies conducted and written by pharmaceutical companies.
Does the Baking Soda Cancer Treatment aka (Sodium Bicarbonate) Work?
https://natureworksbest.com/dr-tullio-simoncini-sodium-
bicarbonate-cancer-treatment/
Dr. Tullio Simoncini is a medical doctor in Italy who has done more than anyone to explore the uses of the baking soda cancer treatment as an alternative cancer treatment. It is known that cancer creates and favors an acid environment and because of this, Dr. Simoncini and others have used sodium bicarbodate as an alkaline therapeutic agent.
The way that acidity seems to protect cancer is not fully understood. It seems that cytotoxic T-cells, which may attack cancer cells under normal conditions, are inactivated in an acid extracellular fluid.[1] Also, the type of acidity that cancer produces, i.e., lactic acid, stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis.[2] This is like a highway project, which enables a tumor to build the blood vessels that it needs to bring the nutrients for it to survive. So the tumor creates an environment in which it can then exist comfortably.
Earlier researchers have found a concurrence between cancer and candida. In Dr. Simoncini’s book, Cancer is a Fungus[3] he notes some similarities between the two. Primarily, both are intractable diseases, each very hard to get rid of. Dr. Simoncini notes that each forms a solid mass of low penetrability, unlike the dispersed forms of bacterial and viral infections in the body or body fluids. Dr. Simoncini notes the problem of surface area in addressing these infections. Whereas bacterial and viral infections are dispersed in the solutions of bodily compartments, and likewise, antibiotics and other anti-microbials dispersed in the same solutions have access to each microbe.
Selenium: Prevent and Cure Cancer
By Elaine Hollingsworth
http://www.doctorsaredangerous.com/articles/selenium.htm
A diagnosis of cancer feels like a stream of ice to the heart. But there is one thing that is even worse than hearing such horrible news: It is what the medical profession has in store for victims of this scourge, which now strikes one out of three in the Western world.
In Big Pharma--Big Medicine countries, doctors are forbidden by law to recommend any natural therapies for cancer. Only the Big Three: radiation, chemotherapy and surgery are permitted. This, in spite of their dismal track record, and the damage they have been proven to do.
The Cancer Industry is Too Prosperous to Allow a Cure
https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/the-cancer-industry-is-too-prosperous-to-allow-a-cure/
We have lost the war on cancer. At the beginning of the last century, one person in twenty would get cancer. In the 1940s it was one out of every sixteen people. In the 1970s it was one person out of ten. Today one person out of three gets cancer in the course of their life.
The cancer industry is probably the most prosperous business in the United States. In 2014, there was an estimated 1,665,540 new cancer cases diagnosed and 585,720 cancer deaths in the US. $6 billion of tax-payer funds are cycled through various federal agencies for cancer research, such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The NCI states that the medical costs of cancer care are $125 billion, with a projected 39 percent increase to $173 billion by 2020.
The simple fact is that the cancer industry employs too many people and produces too much income to allow a cure to be found. All of the current research on cancer drugs is based on the premise that the cancer market will grow, not shrink.
https://www.sott.net/article/228583-Scientists-cure-
cancer-but-no-one-takes-notice
Hubpages.com
Sun, 15 May 2011 17:05 UTC
Canadian researchers find a simple cure for cancer, but major pharmaceutical companies are not interested.
Researchers at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Canada have cured cancer last week, yet there is a little ripple in the news or in TV. It is a simple technique using very basic drug. The method employs dichloroacetate, which is currently used to treat metabolic disorders. So, there is no concern of side effects or about their long term effects.
This drug doesn't require a patent, so anyone can employ it widely and cheaply compared to the costly cancer drugs produced by major pharmaceutical companies.
Canadian scientists tested this dichloroacetate (DCA) on human's cells; it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells and left the healthy cells alone. It was tested on Rats inflicted with severe tumors; their cells shrank when they were fed with water supplemented with DCA. The drug is widely available and the technique is easy to use, why the major drug companies are not involved? Or the Media interested in this find?
Cancer treatment is an extremely lucrative multi-billion dollar industry
https://medium.com/@WhiteFeather9/cancer-treatment-is-an- extremely-lucrative-multi-billion-dollar-industry-fcb2d315b1e1
Cancer treatment is an extremely lucrative multi-billion dollar industry. If a cure for cancer were found that industry would collapse. Treating cancer is far more lucrative than curing it. We have been plowing billions upon billions of dollars into cancer research for many decades now and most of that money has gone into finding obscenely expensive treatment for cancer rather than an actual cure for it.
Cancer research is also an extremely lucrative multi-billion dollar industry. If a cure for cancer were found that money would then dry up for that research industry. If cancer researchers want that flow of money to continue it is in their best interest not to find a cure. We have spent a million times more money and effort into cancer research than we did to land on the moon with far, far, far less results.
Making a Killing with Cancer: A 124.6 Billion Dollar Industry
By Daisy Luther
https://www.theorganicprepper.com/making-a-killing-with-cancer-a-
124-6-billion-dollar-industry/
If you had a business selling something that made you well over a hundred billion dollars per year, would you take steps to eradicate the need for your business? Or would you make every effort for that money continue rolling in?
Take cancer, for example. Don’t let all the media hype about “The Cure” fool you. No one who is in a position to do so wants to end cancer because they are all making a killing on the big business of treatment, while ordinary people go broke, suffer horribly, and die.
There will never be a “cure” brought to market because there just isn’t enough profit in eradicating the disease entirely. There will never be a governing body that protects consumers from being subjected to known carcinogens, because that too, will stop the cash from rolling in. A great deal of research is covered up and many potential cures are ignored and discredited because there is far more money in perpetuating illness than in curing it. In 2012, the reported spending on cancer treatment was 124.6 billion dollars. These 3 Pharmaceutical Companies Control Roughly Half of All Cancer Drug Sales Global cancer drug sales totaled $91 billion in 2013 and are expected to breach $100 billion in sales sooner than you think. Yet, three big pharmaceutical companies currently control about half of all cancer drug sales.These 3 Pharmaceutical Companies Control Roughly Half of All Cancer Drug Sales
Global cancer drug sales totaled $91 billion in 2013 and are expected to breach $100 billion in sales sooner than you think. Yet, three big pharmaceutical companies currently control about half of all cancer drug sales.
Sean Williams
(TMFUltraLong)
Updated: Oct 9, 2018 at 4:34PM
Published: Jan 25, 2015 at 8:03AM
When it comes to diseases and disorders that need the immediate attention of drug developers, there's a good chance you'll find cancer at or very near the top of the list.
Within the United States, cancer is the second leading cause of death, behind only heart disease. The scary thing is that according to the World Health Organization, the incidence rate of cancer is expected to rise over the next two decades from an estimated 14 million diagnoses per year now to 22 million diagnoses. This means consumers need choices now to help what could be a rising tide of cancer diagnoses in the future.
Big pharma turns its focus to cancer
To this end, the good news is that pharmaceutical companies are listening loud and clear. Oncology drug development is a cornerstone to the success of quite a few pharmaceutical companies, not only because it'll keep them profitable, but because it'll save lives and fund additional research into curing new types of cancers and other diseases.
According to the IMS Institute for Health Informatics, consumers and health-benefits providers spent $91 billion globally on cancer drugs in 2013, and this figure is expected to grow to well in excess of $100 billion in coming years.
Furthermore, based on data from GlobalData, aggregated by PMLiVE, the top 25 global pharmaceutical companies accounted for $88.9 billion in global oncology sales in 2013 (this includes generic drug sales as well). But, what's really interesting when you dig into the data is that three companies comprised about half of all cancer drug sales in 2013.
Who's not among the top 10 cancer drug developers in the world by sales? Some surprisingly big names, such as AbbVie, Biogen Idec, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Pfizer. Of course, Pfizer's luck could change with the possible approval of palbociclib.
But, even more high-profile names are left out of the top three. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and Celgene make up spots nine through four. Combined, these six companies were responsible for $24.4 billion in cancer drug sales in 2013. Yet, the No. 1 company on the list sold more oncology drugs than these six companies combined!
Developments
Best Info On (Cannabidiol) CBD Oil for Cancer 2019
Aaron C
https://allcbdoilbenefits.com/cbd-oil-for-cancer/
From my own research I found a study from 2013 in Milan that showed evidence that cannabinoids such as cannabidiol [CBD] may reduce cancer tumor size and slow their growth. Another study showed it may be anti-angiogensis, which means it limits blood flow to the tumors which prevents or reduces their rate of growth.
In neuroblastoma, a dreadful common cancer unfortunately often found in children, cannabidiols were found to be effective with CBD the most effective in treating tumors. The study also found that in laboratory tests that CBD reduced the viability and invasiveness of treated tumor cells, and impeded the growth of tumor xenografts.
Israeli company that claims cure for cancer would face years of testing ahead for US market — even if it works
Angelica LaVeto
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/29/israeli-company-that-claims-cancer-cure-
faces-skeptical-us-market.html
Accelerated Evolution Biotechnologies (AEBi) told the Jerusalem Post it used peptides, which are a chain of amino acids, to target and kill cancer cells in mice.
“We believe we will offer in a year’s time a complete cure for cancer,” the company’s chairman of the board of directors, Dan Aridor, told the Jerusalem Post in an article published Monday.
New therapy cures cancer with just one injection
It neutralized not only the tumor it was injected into but malignancies all over the body.
Philip Perry
11 February, 2018
https://bigthink.com/philip-perry/new-therapy-cures-cancer-with-just-one-injection
Just one injection can be effective for a solid tumor. Such a targeted approach could limit nasty side effects and may even be more effective than current therapies. These results were published in the journal Science Translational Medicine. Dr. Ronald Levy was the study’s senior author. He told Medical News Daily, "When we use these two agents together, we see the elimination of tumors all over the body."
Medical Marijuana
May 20, 2013
by ty Bollinger
https://www.cancertruth.net/hemp-truth-vs-myths/
They were able to destroy incurable brain tumors in rats by injecting them with THC. But sadly, most Americans don’t know anything about the Madrid discovery, since virtually no major US newspapers carried the story. A 2007 Harvard Medical School study showed that the THC in hemp decreases lung cancer tumors by 50% and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to metastasize (spread). Other researchers have also shown that THC is an effective treatment for Hodgkin’s disease and Kaposi’s Sarcoma. A recent study out of Thailand demonstrated that THC can also fight bile duct cancer, which is rare and deadly. As a matter of fact, the International Medical Verities Association includes hemp oil on its cancer protocol. Rick Simpson successfully treated his terminal cancer with hemp oil, and since then has been leading the way to promote hemp oil as a viable cancer treatment.
Natural cures for breast cancer treatment
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4881189/
Munazza Shareef
Institute of Pharmacy, Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Agriculture, 38000 Faisalabad, Pakistan
Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, 430074 Wuhan, PR China
cFaculty of Science and Natural Resources, University Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
Maliha Sarfraz⁎
Institute of Pharmacy, Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Agriculture, 38000 Faisalabad, Pakistan
For centuries, herbs and plants have been used for medicinal purposes and as food as well. This review concerns about different types of plants that retain the immune stimulating and anti-tumor properties. Large variety of active phytochemicals such as carotenoids, flavonoids, ligands, polyphenolics, terpenoids, sulfides, lignans and plant sterols has been identified in different types of herbs. These phytochemicals have different mechanisms of action. They either stimulate the protective enzyme like glutathione transferase or prevent the cell proliferation. This review has centered on the biochemical properties of Allium sativum, Echinacea, Curcuma longa, Arctium lappa, Camellia sinensis, Panax ginseng and Flax seed. Extracts and juices of Withania somnifera, Amoora rohituka, Dysoxylum binectariferum and Vaccinium macrocarpon, respectively also used as anti-breast cancer. The volatile oils and extracts of these herbs and plants inhibit the synthesis of mevalonate that lessen the tumor growth and cholesterol synthesis. Research continues to confirm that high doses of vitamin C injections destroy cancer, but don’t expect to hear that from Big Pharma.
01/11/2016 / By Greg White
https://www.newstarget.com/2016-01-11-research-continues-to-confirm-
that-high-doses-of-vitamin-c-injections-destroy-cancer-but-dont-expect-to-hear-that-from-big-pharma.html
Medical research continues to confirm the cancer-fighting effects of vitamin C. According to a new study published in Science, high doses of vitamin C were able to destroy human colorectal cancers cells harboring specific genetic mutations that are present in half of these cancers.
It’s Hard To Believe That Big Pharma Will Now Hold Patent for CBD/THC Cancer Treatment
http://globalhealthmagz.com/2019/12/07/its-hard-to-believe-that-big-pharma-will-
now-hold-patent-for-cbd-thc-cancer-treatment/
British company, GW Pharmaceuticals, has been a big name in cannabis pharmaceuticals since 1998. They’ve broken through the iron gates surrounding cannabis medicine, so much so that they even got CBD-extract medications (made by Big Pharma) to be removed from Schedule I.
GW Pharma has developed cannabis-based drugs for multiple sclerosis and epilepsy, and now….cancer. That’s right. Big Pharma now holds the patent for cancer treatment using cannabis. Let. That. Sink. In. For. A. Moment.
In 2009, GW went forward with a patent application, alongside collaborator Otsuka Pharmaceutical. At the end of September, GW announced that they had received a Notice of Allowance from the U.S. Patent Office to go forward with production of their cannabis-based cancer treatment, Sativex.
Medicinal Cannabis: The EvidencePeter Reynolds, 27th February 2015
https://www.bmj.com/sites/default/files/response_attachments/2015/03/Medicinal
%20Cannabis%20The%20Evidence%20V1.pdf
Medicinal Cannabis: The Evidence3AbstractThis paper reviews the evidence in support of the safety and efficacy of using raw herbal cannabis as medicine.It is widely claimed that there is insufficient evidence to support medicinal use but this is not borne out by the facts, let alone 10,000 years of human history. In fact,there is so much evidence available for so many conditions that this paper is restricted to conditions for which cannabis appears to have the most beneficial effects.Side effects and risks of medicinal cannabis are very well documented in the literature, muchof which is focused on identifying harms of recreational use. The risks are extremely lowin a therapeutic context compared with pharmaceutical medicines
A Cure for Cancer? How CAR T-Cell Therapy is Revolutionizing Oncology
Clara Rodreiguez Fernandez
https://www.labiotech.eu/features/car-t-therapy-cancer-review/
The field of immuno-oncology is booming with billions of euros in investment. The ability to rewire our own immune system to fight cancer has certainly created huge expectations. After the success of the first checkpoint inhibitor drugs on the market, many are turning their attention to CAR-T cell therapy.
There are two CAR-T therapies already on the market. The field is now booming, with over 800 CAR-T clinical trials running. But is this therapy really a cure for cancer, as many seem to believe? Can the technology meet such high expectations? Are side effects a concern? Is it worth the huge price tag? To answer the most burning questions, I talked with some of the leaders in this field to draw an overview of the current state of CAR-T technology.
Pharmaceutical CEO: Cancer Drug Is Only For Westerners Who Can Afford It
https://thinkprogress.org/pharmaceutical-ceo-cancer-drug-is-only-for-westerners-who-can-afford-it-be2a7122d1/
Adam Peck
“Is this going to have a big effect on our business model? No, because we did not develop this product for the Indian market, let’s be honest. We developed this product for Western patients who can afford this product, quite honestly. It is an expensive product, being an oncology product.” The comment was in response to a decision by an Indian patent court that granted a compulsory license to a local company to reproduce Bayer’s drug. Under Indian patent laws, if a product is not available locally at a reasonable cost, other companies may apply for licenses to reproduce those products at a more affordable price. Nexavar costs an estimated $69,000 for a full year of treatment in India, 41 times the country’s annual per capita income.
Landmark Study Shows Half of Cancer Patients are Killed by Chemo — NOT Cancer
Claire Bernish
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/chemotherapy-study-cancer-patients/
No matter how much doctors push the treatment, chemotherapy might not be the best option in the fight against cancer, as a new study shows up to 50 percent of patients are killed by the drugs — not the disease, itself.
Researchers from Public Health England and Cancer Research UK performed a groundbreaking study examining for the first time the numbers of cancer patients who died within 30 days of beginning chemotherapy — indicating the treatment, not the cancer, was the cause of death.
Looking at those death rates in hospitals across the U.K., researchers found an alarming mortality rate associated with chemotherapy.
12 Natural Cancer Treatments Revealed
By Dr. Josh Axe, DC, DMN, CNS
Then, around nine years after her first diagnosis, a terrible thing happened: She was diagnosed with cancer again. At that point, I had experience working in the natural health field, so when I flew home, we prayed together and talked about the best healthcare strategy. She decided to pursue natural cancer treatments by focusing on diet and lifestyle changes.
My mom started following an all-natural plan that included vegetable juicing, probiotic foods, immune-boosting supplements, stress reducing techniques and prayer. And after only four months, the tumors on her lungs had shrunk significantly and one year after that, she was again diagnosed as being “cancer-free” and healthy. It’s now been 10 years and my mom recently turned 60 years old — and she is in the best shape of her life, regularly water skiing, running and still going strong.
A Review of Alternative Cancer Therapies
by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News
Effective Alternative Cancer Cures are a Threat to Modern Medicine
https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/unapproved-but-effective-cancer-cures/
Conventional physicians want us to believe that there are only three treatments for cancer – surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. In fact, allopathic physicians have exclusively use these three approaches for the past 100 years with very little long-term success. Even though it is clear that even the US government admits that radiation and chemo both cause cancer, these therapies continue to be used with little concern about the new cancers that they cause.
Why Medicine Won’t Allow Cancer to Be Cured
By Dr. Mercola
Nearly two million Americans are diagnosed with cancer every year—one person out of three will be hit with a cancer diagnosis at some time in their lives, in spite of the massive technological advances over the past half-century.
Western medicine is no closer to finding a "cancer cure," while cancer has grown into a worldwide epidemic of staggering proportions. The statistics speak for themselves:
- In the early 1900s, one in 20 people developed cancer
- In the 1940s, one in 16 people developed cancer
- In the 1970s, it was one in 10
- Today, it's one in three!
According to the CDC, about 1,660,290 (1.66 million) new cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in 20131. If overall death rates are falling, why are incidence rates still on the rise? The answer is simple: the 40-year "war on cancer" has been a farce.
The cancer epidemic is a dream for Big Pharma, and their campaigns to silence cancer cures have been fierce, which is a tale well told in the documentary film featured above, Cancer: Forbidden Cures.
CANCER FACTS
http://cancernaturalcure.com/facts1.htm
Even the Journal of the American Medical Association took note of the phenomenon when, in its diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer by Dr. Maurice Fox, a biologist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. On the basis of studies carried out at the Harvard School of Public health, Dr. Fox found, among other things, that: Those who refused medical procedures had a lower mortality rate than those who submitted.
The Cancer Industry
The cancer industry consists of corporations, organizations, and agencies that diminish or mask the extent of the cancer problem, fail to protect our health, or divert attention away from the importance of finding the causes of breast cancer and working to prevent the disease. This includes drug companies that, in addition to profiting from cancer treatment drugs, sometimes produce toxic chemicals that may be contributing to the high rates of cancer in this country and increasing rates throughout the world. It also includes the polluting industries that continue to release substances are known or suspected to be dangerous to our health, and the public relations firms and public agencies that protect these polluters. The cancer industry includes organizations like the American Cancer Society that downplay the risk of cancer from pesticides and other environmental factors, and that historically have refused to take a stand on environmental regulation.
Why Preventing Cancer Is Not the Priority in Drug Development
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/upshot/why-preventing-cancer-is-not-the-priority-in-drug-development.html
The Truth About the Drug Companies
By Marcia Angell, M.D.
10-Page Summary Exposes a Major Health Cover-up
For a two-page summary of the health cover-up, click here
https://www.wanttoknow.info/truthaboutdrugcompanies
"The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion) [in 2002]. Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself."
The below eye-opening essay by Dr. Marcia Angell covers essential points in her highly acclaimed book The Truth About the Drug Companies. This essay is taken from the New York Review of Books, Volume 51, Number 12. Dr. Angell is a former +Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It.
Greed and Corruption: Newly Unsealed Court Exhibits Reveal the Inner Workings of Big Pharma
July 29th, 2019
By Nikki Harper
Contributing Writer for Wake Up World
https://wakeup-world.com/2019/07/29/greed-and-corruption-newly-revealed-court-exhibits-reveal-the-inner-workings-of-big-pharma/
Newly unsealed exhibits in a huge Cleveland lawsuit are revealing the depths of corruption and due diligence failure within the nation’s biggest drug companies. Even against what we already know about Big Pharma and its agenda, the scale of callousness and greed is shocking. As America remains in the grip of an opioid addiction crisis, there seems to be little evidence of Big Pharma either taking responsibility or changing its practices.
A DEA database made public as part of the lawsuit reveals the scale of the problem in stark terms. Between them, these companies sold and distributed more than 76 billion oxycodone and hydrocodone pills between 2006-12.
The scale of the distribution cannot be justified by any logical means. For example, McKesson sent 5 million opioid pills over two years to a single pharmacy located in Kermit, WV. Population of Kermit? Just 380 people. That averages out to around 17 pills per day for every single man, woman and child in the town.
In another incident revealed by the exhibits, Heather Goodman, a former VP at Cardinal Health, requested assistance for her “Aunt Sandra” – assistance to the tune of 50 x 15mg oxycodone every day for a month. Despite internal concerns raised by a senior manager, and incredulity from the pharmacist charged with handing over the drugs to the customer, the deal went ahead. Where the DEA has acted, there is still no guarantee that justice will be served on Big Pharma. You only have to look at the 2011 DEA investigation into Mallinckrodt, triggered by the supply of hundreds of millions of oxycodone pills into Florida. The DEA concluded that the company had over 44,000 federal violations and which would have resulted in a fine of over $2 billion. Following negotiations, however, Mallinckrodt eventually reached a settlement which saw them pay only $35 million, with no admission of fault or wrongdoing.
